Áttekintés a nem szó szerinti jelentések megértése során aktiválódó agyterületekről

Svindt Veronika a HUN-REN Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont Pszicho- és Neurolingvisztikai Kutatócsoportjának tudományos főmunkatársa. Kutatási területe a neuropragmatika és a pragmatika, azon belül is a pragmatikai képesség tipikus és atipikus fejlődése. Emellett vizsgálja bizonyos neurodegeneratív betegségekben a kognitív és nyelvi működés összefüggéseit.

Veronika Svindt is a Senior Research Fellow at the Psycho- and Neurolinguistics Research Group of the HUN-REN Linguistics Research Center. Her research focuses on neuropragmatics and pragmatics, specifically the typical and atypical development of pragmatic abilities. Additionally, she investigates the relationships between cognitive and linguistic functions in certain neurodegenerative diseases.

Elérhetőség/e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

• Ackeren, Markus J. van – Daniel Casasanto – Harold Bekkering – Peter Hagoort – Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer 2012. Pragmatics in action: Indirect requests engage theory of mind areas and the cortical motor network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24/11:2237–2247. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00274 .
• Ackeren, Markus J. van – Areti Smaragdi – Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer 2016. Neuronal interactions between mentalising and action systems during indirect request processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 11/9:1402–1410. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw062 .
• Ahrens, Kathleen – Ho-Ling Liu – Chia-Ying Lee – Shu-Ping Gong – Shin-Yi Fang – Yuan-Yu Hsu 2007. Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language 100/2:163–171. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.004 .
• Akimoto, Yoritaka – Motoaki Sugiura – Yukihito Yomogida – Carlos Makoto Miyauchi – Shiho Miyazawa – Ryuta Kawashima 2014. Irony comprehension: Social conceptual knowledge and emotional response. Human Brain Mapping 35/4:1167–1178. doi:10.1002/hbm.22242 .
• Bambini, Valentina – Claudio Gentili – Emiliano Ricciardi – Pier Marco Bertinetto – Pietro Pietrini 2011. Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Bulletin 86/3–4:203–216. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.07.015 .
• Bašnáková, Jana – Kirsten Weber – Karl Magnus Petersson – Jos van Berkum – Peter Hagoort 2014. Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex 24/10:2572–2578. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht112 .
• Beaty, Roger E. – Paul J. Silvia – Mathias Benedek 2017. Brain networks underlying novel metaphor production. Brain and Cognition 111:163–170. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.12.004 .
• Bendersky, Mariana – Carolina Lomlomdjian – Valeria Abusamra – Bautista Elizalde Acevedo – Silvia Kochen – Lucía Alba-Ferrara 2021. Functional anatomy of idiomatic expressions. Brain Topography 34/4:489–503. doi:10.1007/s10548-021-00843-3 .
• Benedek, Mathias – Roger Beaty – Emanuel Jauk – Karl Koschutnig – Andreas Fink – Paul J. Silvia – Beate Dunst – Aljoscha C. Neubauer 2014. Creating metaphors: The neural basis of figurative language production. NeuroImage 90:99–106. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.046 .
• Bohrn, Isabel C. – Ulrike Altmann – Arthur M. Jacobs 2012. Looking at the brains behind figurative language: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia 50/11:2669–2683. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021 .
• Bosco, Francesca M. – Alberto Parola – Maria C. Valentini – Rosalba Morese 2017. Neural correlates underlying the comprehension of deceitful and ironic communicative intentions. Cortex 94:73–86. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.010 .
• Boulenger, Véronique – Olaf Hauk – Friedmann Pulvermuller 2009. Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex 19/8:1905–1914. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn217 .
• Chen, Evan – Page Widick – Anjan Chatterjee 2008. Functional–anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing. Brain and Language 107/3:194–202. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.007 .
• Citron, Francesca M. M. – Cristina Cacciari – Jakob M. Funcke – Chun-Ting Hsu – Arthur M. Jacobs 2019. Idiomatic expressions evoke stronger emotional responses in the brain than literal sentences. Neuropsychologia 131:233–248. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.020 .
• Citron, Francesca M. M. – Adele E. Goldberg 2014. Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26/11:2585–2595. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00654 .
• Citron, Francesca M. M. – Jeremie Güsten – Nora Michaelis – Adele E. Goldberg 2016. Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response. NeuroImage 139:218–230. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.020 .
• Collins, D. Louis – Peter Neelin – Terrence M. Peters – Alan C. Evans 1994. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 18/2:192.
• Desai, Rutvik H. – Lisa L. Conant – Jeffrey R. Binder – Haeil Park – Mark S. Seidenberg 2013. A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage 83:862–869. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.044 .
• Diaz, Michele T. – Kyle T. Barrett – Larson J. Hogstrom 2011. The influence of sentence novelty and figurativeness on brain activity. Neuropsychologia 49/3:320–330. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.004 .
• Diaz, Michele T. – Larson J. Hogstrom 2011. The influence of context on hemispheric recruitment during metaphor processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23/11:3586–3597. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00053 .
• Eickhoff, Simon B. – Angela R. Laird – P. Mickle Fox – Jack L. Lancaster – Peter T. Fox 2017. Implementation errors in the GingerALE Software: Description and recommendations. Human Brain Mapping 38/1:7–11. doi:10.1002/hbm.23342 .
• Eickhoff, Simon B. – Angela R. Laird – Christian Grefkes – Ling E. Wang – Karl Zilles – Peter T. Fox 2009. Coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data: A random‐effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping 30/9:2907–2926. doi:10.1002/hbm.20718 .
• Farkas, Andrew H. – Rebekah L. Trotti – Elizabeth A. Edge – Ling-Yu Huang – Aviva Kasowski – Olivia F. Thomas – Eli Chlan – Maria P. Granros – Kajol K. Patel – Dean Sabatinelli 2021. Humor and emotion: Quantitative meta analyses of functional neuroimaging studies. Cortex 139:60–72. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.023 .
• Feng, Wangshu – Yue Wu – Catherine Jan – Hongbo Yu – Xiaoming Jiang – Xiaolin Zhou 2017. Effects of contextual relevance on pragmatic inference during conversation: An fMRI study. Brain and Language 171:52–61. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.04.005 .
• Ferstl, Evelyn C. – Jane Neumann – Carsten Bogler – D. Yves Von Cramon 2008. The extended language network: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 29/5:581–593. doi:10.1002/hbm.20422 .
• Filik, Ruth – Alexandra Ţurcan – Christina Ralph-Nearman – Alain Pitiot 2019. What is the difference between irony and sarcasm? An fMRI study. Cortex 115:112–122. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.025 .
• Forgács, Bálint – Isabel Bohrn – Jürgen Baudewig – Markus J. Hofmann – Csaba Pléh – Arthur M. Jacobs 2012. Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words. NeuroImage 63/3:1432–1442. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029 .
• Gaudet, Isabelle – Alejandra Hüsser – Phetsamone Vannasing – Anne Gallagher 2020. Functional brain connectivity of language functions in children revealed by EEG and MEG: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:62. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00062 .
• Giora, Rachel 2003. On Our Mind. Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hartung, Franziska – Yoed N. Kenett – Eileen R. Cardillo – Stacey Humphries – Nathaniel Klooster – Anjan Chatterjee 2020. Context matters: Novel metaphors in supportive and non-supportive contexts. NeuroImage 212:116645. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116645 .
• Hauptman, Miriam – Idan Blank – Evelina Fedorenko 2023. Non-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and theory of mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach. Cortex 162:96–114. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.013 .
• Hornick, Shiri – Einat Shetreet 2022. Pragmatic inferences: Neuroimaging of ad-hoc implicatures. Journal of Neurolinguistics 64:101090. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101090 .
• Jang, Gijeong – Shin-ae Yoon – Sung-Eun Lee – Haeil Park – Joohan Kim – Jeong Hoon Ko – Hae-Jeong Park 2013. Everyday conversation requires cognitive inference: Neural bases of comprehending implicated meanings in conversations. NeuroImage 81:61–72. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.027 .
• Kana, Rajesh K. – Donna L. Murdaugh – Kelly R. Wolfe – Sandhya L. Kumar 2012. Brain responses mediating idiom comprehension: Gender and hemispheric differences. Brain Research 1467:18–26. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.031 .
• Kövecses, Zoltán 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614408 .
• Kuperberg, Rita – Philip McGuire – Edward T. Bullmore – M. J. Brammer – S. Rabe-Hesketh – I. C. Wright – D. J. Lythgoe – S. C. R. Williams – A. S. David 2000. Common and distinct neural substrates for pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic processing of spoken sentences: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12/2:321–341. doi:10.1162/089892900562138 .
• Kutas Mária 2014. A szó szerinti és a képes nyelv feldolgozása mint emberi agyi funkció. In Pléh Csaba – Lukács Ágnes (szerk.) Pszicholingvisztika. Magyar pszicholingvisztikai kézikönyv. Vol. 2 Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 1135–1166.
• Lacey, Simon – Randall Stilla – K. Sathian 2012. Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language 120/3:416–421. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.016 .
• Laird, Angela R. – Simon B. Eickhoff – Florian Kurth – Peter M. Fox – Angela M. Uecker – Jessica A. Turner – Jennifer L. Robinson – Jack L. Lancaster – Peter T. Fox 2009. ALE meta-analysis workflows via the BrainMap database: Progress towards a probabilistic functional brain atlas. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 3:23. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.023.2009 .
• Lee, Susan S. – Mirella Dapretto 2006. Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere. NeuroImage 29/2:536–544. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.003 .
• Licea-Haquet, Giovanna L. – Azalea Reyes-Aguilar – Sarael Alcauter – Magda Giordano 2021. The neural substrate of speech act recognition. Neuroscience 471:102–114. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.07.020 .
• Li, Sai – Xiaoming Jiang – Hongbo Yu – Xiaolin Zhou 2014. Cognitive empathy modulates the processing of pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehension. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9/8:1166–1174. doi:10.1093/scan/nst091 .
• Litwińczuk, Marta Czime – Nils Muhlert – Lauren Cloutman – Nelson Trujillo-Barreto – Anna Woollams 2022. Combination of structural and functional connectivity explains unique variation in specific domains of cognitive function. NeuroImage 262:119531. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119531 .
• Liu, Di – Lei Hao – Lei Han – Ying Zhou – Shaozheng Qin – Kazuhisa Niki – Wangbing Shen – Baoguo Shi – Jing Luo 2023. The optimal balance of controlled and spontaneous processing in insight problem solving: fMRI evidence from Chinese idiom guessing. Psychophysiology 60/7:e14240. doi:10.1111/psyp.14240 .
• Mashal, Nira – Miriam Faust – Talma Hendler – Mark Jung-Beeman 2007. An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and Language 100/2:115–126. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.005 .
• Mashal, Nira – Miriam Faust – Talma Hendler – Mark Jung-Beeman 2009. An fMRI study of processing novel metaphoric sentences. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 14/1:30–54. doi:10.1080/13576500802049433 .
• Müller, Veronika I. – Edna C. Cieslik – Angela R. Laird – Peter T. Fox – Joaquim Radua et al. 2018. Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 84:151–161. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.012 .
• Nagels, Arne – Christina Kauschke – Judith Schrauf – Carin Whitney – Benjamin Straube – Tilo Kircher 2013. Neural substrates of figurative language during natural speech perception: an fMRI study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 7. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00121 .
• Obert, Alexandre – Fabien Gierski – Arnaud Calmus – Aurélie Flucher – Christophe Portefaix – Laurent Pierot – Arthur Kaladjian – Stéphanie Caillies 2016. Neural correlates of contrast and humor: Processing common features of verbal irony. PLOS ONE 11/11:e0166704. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166704 .
• Obert, Alexandre – Fabien Gierski – Arnaud Calmus – Christophe Portefaix – Christelle Declercq – Laurent Pierot – Stéphanie Caillies 2014. Differential bilateral involvement of the parietal gyrus during predicative metaphor processing: An auditory fMRI study. Brain and Language 137:112–119. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.002 .
• Oldham, Stuart – Alex Fornito 2019. The development of brain network hubs. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 36:100607. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.005 .
• Olm, Christopher A. – Corey T. McMillan – Nicola Spotorno – Robin Clark – Murray Grossman 2014. The relative contributions of frontal and parietal cortex for generalized quantifier comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00610 .
• Pléh Csaba 2000. A modularitás és pragmatika: Néhány egyszerű és bonyolult kapcsolat. Erdélyi Pszichológiai Szemle 1/4:9–30.
• Pléh Csaba 2007. A tér és a nyelv világa. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 62/3:279–312. doi:10.1556/mpszle.62.2007.3.1 .
• Pléh Csaba 2020. Pragmatika és pszicholingvisztika összekapcsolódásának változatai. Magyar Nyelvőr 144/1:86–103. doi:10.38143/Nyr.2020.1.86 .
• Pomp, Jennifer – Anne-Kathrin Bestgen – Patrick Schulze – Christina J. Müller – Francesca M. M. Citron – Boris Suchan – Lars Kuchinke 2018. Lexical olfaction recruits olfactory orbitofrontal cortex in metaphorical and literal contexts. Brain and Language 179:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2018.02.001 .
• Powell, Joanne L. – Joe Furlong – Christophe E. de Bézenac – Noreen O’Sullivan – Rhiannon Corcoran 2019. The pragmatics of pragmatic language and the curse of ambiguity: An fMRI study. Neuroscience 418:96–109. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.039 .
• Prat, Chantel S. – Robert A. Mason – Marcel Adam Just 2012. An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: The influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38/2:282–294. doi:10.1037/a0026037 .
• Rapp, Alexander M. – Michael Erb – Wolfgang Grodd – Mathias Bartels – Katja Markert 2011. Neural correlates of metonymy resolution. Brain and Language 119/3:196–205. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.004 .
• Rapp, Alexander M. – Dirk T. Leube – Michael Erb – Wolfgang Grodd – Tilo T. J. Kircher 2004. Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Cognitive Brain Research 20/3:395–402. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.017 .
• Rapp, Alexander M. – Dorothee E. Mutschler – Michael Erb 2012. Where in the brain is nonliteral language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. NeuroImage 63/1:600–610. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022 .
• Rapp, Alexander M. – Dorothee E. Mutschler – Barbara Wild – Michael Erb – I. Lengsfeld – Ralf Saur – Wolfgang Grodd 2010. Neural correlates of irony comprehension: The role of schizotypal personality traits. Brain and Language 113/1:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.11.007 .
• Reyes-Aguilar, Azalea – Elizabeth Valles-Capetillo – Magda Giordano 2018. A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of pragmatic language comprehension: In search of a universal neural substrate. Neuroscience 395:60–88. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.10.043 .
• Romero Lauro, Leonor J. – Giulia Mattavelli – Costanza Papagno – Marco Tettamanti 2013. She runs, the road runs, my mind runs, bad blood runs between us: Literal and figurative motion verbs: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 83:361–371. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.050 .
• Romero Lauro, Leonor J. – Marco Tettamanti – Stefano F. Cappa – Costanza Papagno 2008. Idiom comprehension: A prefrontal task? Cerebral Cortex 18/1:162–170. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm042 .
• Samur, Dalya – Vicky T. Lai – Peter Hagoort – Roel M. Willems 2015. Emotional context modulates embodied metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia 78:108–114. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.003 .
• Schmidt, Gwenda L. – Carol A. Seger 2009. Neural correlates of metaphor processing: The roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and Cognition 71/3:375–386. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001 .
• Schnell, Zsuzsanna 2024. Rethinking linguistic relativity in idiomaticity: Conceptual universals and frames of reference in pragmatic competence. In Judit Baranyiné Kóczy – Veronika Jávor-Szelid (szerk.) Proceedings of the Third Cultural Linguistics International Conference in June 2021. Past in Present: Metaphor and Reconceptualized Tradition. Singapore: Springer. megjelenés alatt.
• Shetreet, Einat – Gennaro Chierchia – Nadine Gaab 2014. When some is not every: Dissociating scalar implicature generation and mismatch. Human Brain Mapping 35/4:1503–1514. doi:10.1002/hbm.22269 .
• Shibata, Midori – Jun-ichi Abe – Hiroaki Itoh – Koji Shimada – Satoshi Umeda 2011. Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task. Neuropsychologia 49/13:3542–3550. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.006 .
• Shibata, Midori – Jun-ichi Abe – Atsushi Terao – Tamaki Miyamoto 2007. Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric and literal sentences: An fMRI study. Brain Research 1166:92–102. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040 .
• Shibata, Midori – Akira Toyomura – Hiroaki Itoh – Jun-ichi Abe 2010. Neural substrates of irony comprehension: A functional MRI study. Brain Research 1308:114–123. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.030 .
• Shibata, Midori – Akira Toyomura – Hiroki Motoyama – Hiroaki Itoh – Yasuhiro Kawabata – Jun-ichi Abe 2012. Does simile comprehension differ from metaphor comprehension? A functional MRI study. Brain and Language 121/3:254–260. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.006 .
• Spotorno, Nicola – Eric Koun – Jérôme Prado – Jean-Baptiste van der Henst – Ira A. Noveck 2012. Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: The case of irony. NeuroImage 63/1:25–39. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.046 .
• Stringaris, Argyris K. – Nicholas C. Medford – Vincent Giampietro – Michael J. Brammer – Anthony S. David 2007. Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences. Brain and Language 100/2:150–162. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.08.001 .
• Stringaris, Argyris K. – Nicholas Medford – Rachel Giora – Vincent C. Giampietro – Michael J. Brammer – Anthony S. David 2006. How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex. NeuroImage 33/2:784–793. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.057 .
• Subramaniam, Karuna – Mark Beeman – Miriam Faust – Nira Mashal 2013. Positively valenced stimuli facilitate creative novel metaphoric processes by enhancing medial prefrontal cortical activation. Frontiers in Psychology 4:211. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00211 .
• Talairach, Jean – Pierre Tournoux 1988. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. Thieme.
• Uchiyama, Hitoshi – Ayumi Seki – Hiroko Kageyama – Daisuke N. Saito – Tatsuya Koeda – Kousaku Ohno – Norihiro Sadato 2006. Neural substrates of sarcasm: A functional magnetic-resonance imaging study. Brain Research 1124/1:100–110. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.088 .
• Uddin, Lucina Q. – Kaustubh S. Supekar – Srikanth Ryali – Vinod Menon 2011. Dynamic reconfiguration of structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with development. The Journal of Neuroscience 31/50:18578–18589. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4465-11.2011 .
• Valles-Capetillo, Elizabeth – Cristian D. Ibarra – Magda Giordano 2023. Irony detection engages the Precuneus and Inferior Frontal Gyrus and relies on integration of contextual cues and inferential skills. Preprint. doi:10.1101/2022.08.15.504018 .
• Vartanian, Oshin 2012. Dissociable neural systems for analogy and metaphor: Implications for the neuroscience of creativity. British Journal of Psychology 103/3:302–316. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02073.x .
• Vrticka, Pascal – Jessica M. Black – Allan L. Reiss 2013. The neural basis of humour processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14/12:860–868. doi:10.1038/nrn3566 .
• Wakusawa, Keisuke – Motoaki Sugiura – Yuko Sassa – Hyeonjeong Jeong – Kaoru Horie – Shigeru Sato – Hiroyuki Yokoyama – Shigeru Tsuchiya – Kazuie Inuma – Ryuta Kawashima 2007. Comprehension of implicit meanings in social situations involving irony: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage 37/4:1417–1426. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.013 .
• Wallentin, Mikkel – Svend Østergaard – Torben Ellegaard Lund – Leif Østergaard – Andreas Roepstorff 2005. Concrete spatial language: See what I mean? Brain and Language 92/3:221–233. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.106 .
• Yang, Jie 2014. The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: A meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 35/1:107–122. doi:10.1002/hbm.22160 .
• Yang, Jie – Ping Li – Xiaoping Fang – Hua Shu – Youyi Liu – Lang Chen 2016. Hemispheric involvement in the processing of Chinese idioms: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 87:12–24. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.029 .
• Yang, Jie – Hua Shu 2016. Involvement of the motor system in comprehension of non-literal action language: A meta-analysis study. Brain Topography 29/1:94–107. doi:10.1007/s10548-015-0427-5 .
• Yang, XiaoHong – HuiJie Li – Nan Lin – XiuPing Zhang – YinShan Wang – Ying Zhang – Qian Zhang – XiNian Zuo – YuFang Yang 2019. Uncovering cortical activations of discourse comprehension and their overlaps with common large-scale neural networks. NeuroImage 203:116200. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116200 .
• Yi, You Gyoung – Dae Yul Kim – Woo Hyun Shim – Joo Young Oh – Sung Hyun Kim – Ho Sung Kim 2017. Neural correlates of Korean proverb processing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain and Behavior 7/10:e00829. doi:10.1002/brb3.829 .
• Yu, Fei – Jianxin Zhang – Jin Fan – Jing Luo – Wencai Zhang 2019. Hippocampus and amygdala: An insight-related network involved in metaphorical solution to mental distress problem. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 19/4:1022–1035. doi:10.3758/s13415-019-00702-6 .
• Zempleni, Monika-Zita – Marco Haverkort – Remco Renken – Laurie A. Stowe 2007. Evidence for bilateral involvement in idiom comprehension: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 34/3:1280–1291. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.049 .

• Letöltés (pdf)

Ez a mű Creative Commons Nevezd meg! - Ne add el! - Ne változtasd! 4.0 Nemzetközi Licenc alatt van.

Ne felejtsen el hivatkozni!

Svindt Veronika 2024. Áttekintés a nem szó szerinti jelentések megértése során aktiválódó agyterületekről. ALE-metaanalízis. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 11/1:143–174. doi:10.14232/JENY.2024.1.6

bibtex

@article{JENY-2024-6-SvindtV,
	author = {Svindt, Veronika},
	year = {2024},
	title = {Áttekintés a nem szó szerinti jelentések megértése során aktiválódó agyterületekről},
	abstract = {Jelen tanulmány célja a pragmatikai megértés neurális hátterének feltérképezése. Ehhez egy, a nemzetközi szakirodalomban jól ismert módszert, az ALE (activation likelihood estimation) metaanalízist alkalmaztam. A tanulmányok szűrése és válogatása után 63 tanulmányt elemeztem. A vizsgált pragmatikai jelenségek a metafora, metonímia, irónia, szarkazmus, implikatúrák, beszédaktusok, idiómák és szólások voltak. A metaanalízis 1204 résztvevő adataiból készült. 590 aktivációs gócot azonosítottam a figuratív > szó szerinti megértés kontrasztjára. Az azonosított aktivációs gócok egy része az agynak egyrészt valamely strukturális csomópontja, mint a precuneus, a superior frontális gyrus, a superior parietális lebeny, az insula, a hippocampus vagy a thalamus. Másrészt az azonosított területek között agyi funkcionális hálózatok (mint pl. a nyelvi vagy a tudatelméleti hálózat) csomópontjait is megtaláljuk, mint bilaterálisan a precuneus, a frontális lebeny laterális és mediális gyrusai, a temporális lebeny superior és középső gyrusai, az amygdala; valamint a bal inferior és superior parietális lebeny, az insula és a cinguláris kéreg.},
	doi = {10.14232/JENY.2024.1.6},
	language = {hu},
	journal = {Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat},
	issn = {2064-9940},
	volume = {11},
	issue = {1},
	pages = {143-174},
	url = {http://www.jeny.szte.hu/JENY-2024-6-SvindtV},
	urldate = {2024-09-10},
	copyright = {Copyright for all material published in JENY lies with the author.}
}