Disjunction as a Positive Polarity Item The effect of prosody on the interpretation of Hungarian negated disjunctive sentences

Main Article Content

Balázs Surányi
Máté Gulás

Abstract

Negated disjunctive sentences are potentially logically ambiguous: when disjunction takes wide scope (Disjunction Wide, DW) relative to negation, the “not one or not the other” interpretation emerges. Disjunction occurring in the direct scope of clausemate negation, however, results in the “neither” interpretation of the sentence (Disjunction Narrow, DN). Prior theoretical literature claims that in certain languages – including Hungarian – the DN interpretation seems to be missing, as in these languages disjunction is a Positive Polarity Item (PPI). On the basis of the theory of parametric cross-linguistic variation regarding disjunction (+/–PPI languages) many languages have been categorized as +PPI. However, in some of the languages originally claimed to be +PPI contradictory empirical results have emerged in recent empirical work regarding the +/–PPI status of disjunction. These contradictions raise the possibility that in addition to the +/–PPE status of a language's disjunction other, so far unstudied factors may play a role in the availability of the DN reading of negated disjunctive sentences.
In view of this our study aims to empirically investigate (i) the availability of the two possible scope readings of Hungarian negated disjunctive sentences, and (ii) the potential effect of sentence prosody on the availability of these interpretations. The judgments collected in our acceptability test show that although the DN reading is marked in Hungarian, it is far from unavailable. The results of our prosodic perception experiment indicate that prosody can have a significant effect on the availability of the two possible interpretations, and in a favorable prosodic condition, the DN reading is accepted by the speakers in almost half of the cases. This finding supports the significant role of prosody in the interpretation of negated disjunctive sentences, which has so far not yet been demonstrated in any language among adult speakers. The results of our study raise new research questions for the parametric PPI theory of disjunction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Surányi, B. and Gulás, M. 2022. Disjunction as a Positive Polarity Item: The effect of prosody on the interpretation of Hungarian negated disjunctive sentences. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat. 9, 1 (Dec. 2022), 185–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14232/JENY.2022.1.8.
Section
Article
Author Biographies

Balázs Surányi, Research Institute of Linguistics; PPKE Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

Balázs Surányi is research professor at the Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics and full professor at Pázmány Péter Catholic University. His areas of interest are syntax and its interfaces with Information Structure, semantics and prosody.

Máté Gulás, Research Institute of Linguistics; PPKE Doctoral School of Linguistics

Máté Gulás is junior research fellow at the Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics and PhD student at the Doctoral School of Linguistics at Pázmány Péter Catholic University. His areas of interest, which are also at the centre of his dissertation topic, are disjunction, polarity items, prosody and language acquisition.

References

Baltazani, Mary 2002. Quantifier scope and the role of intonation in Greek. Disszertáció. Los Angeles: University of California.

Bartels, Christine 1999. The Intonation of English Statements and Questions. A Compositional Interpretation. New York: Routledge.

Bates, Douglas – Martin Mächler – Ben Bolker – Steve Walker 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67/1:1–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Beck, Sigrid – Shin-Sook Kim 2006. Intervention effects in alternative questions. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9/3:165–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-006-9005-2

Crain, Stephen 2012. The Emergence of Meaning. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842863

É. Kiss, Katalin 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. (Cambridge Syntax Guides) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755088

Fox, John – Sanford Weisberg 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Third edition. Los Angeles, London: SAGE.

Frazier, Lyn – Edward Gibson (szerk.) 2015. Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing. Studies in Honor of Janet Dean Fodor. (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 46) Cham: Springer.

Gao, Na – Rosalind Thornton – Peng Zhou – Stephen Crain 2018. Differences in scope assignments for child and adult speakers of Mandarin. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47/6:1219–1241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9557-8

Geçkin, Vasfiye – Rosalind Thornton – Stephen Crain 2018. Children’s interpretation of disjunction in negative sentences: A comparison of Turkish and German. Language Acquisition 25/2:197–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2017.1280796

Goro, Takuya 2004. Japanese disjunction and the locality of positive polarity. Előadás. Georgetown University Round Table.

Goro, Takuya 2007. Language-specific Constraints on Scope Interpretation in First Language Acquisition. Disszertáció. College Park: University of Maryland. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/7345.

Goro, Takuya 2017. Negation, uncertainty, and the Truth Value Judgment Task. In Mineharu Nakayama – Yi-ching Su – Aijun Huang (szerk.) Studies in Chinese and Japanese Language Acquisition. In honor of Stephen Crain. (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 60) Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 41–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.60.03gor

Goro, Takuya – Sachie Akiba 2004a. Japanese disjunction and the acquisition of positive polarity. Proceedings of the 5th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hitsui Shobo. 137–162.

Goro, Takuya – Sachie Akiba 2004b. The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In Vineeta Chand – Ann Kelleher – Angelo J. Rodríguez – Benjamin Schmeiser (szerk.) WCCFL 23: Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Summerville: Cascadilla Press. 251–264.

Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina 2016. Size matters: The syntax of disjunctive questions. Linguistic Inquiry 47/2:283–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00211

Han, Chung-hye – Maribel Romero 2004. The syntax of whether/Q... or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22/3:527–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000027674.87552.71

Homer, Vincent 2021. Domains of polarity items. Journal of Semantics 38/1:1–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffaa006

Hunyadi, László 1981. Remarks on the syntax and semantics of topic and focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31/1/4:107–136.

Hunyadi, László 1999. The outlines of a metrical syntax of Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46/1/2:69–93.

Hunyadi, László 2002. Hungarian Sentence Prosody and Universal Grammar. On the Phonology–Syntax Interface. (MetaLinguistica 13) Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Ionin, Tania – Tatiana Luchkina 2018. Focus on Russian scope: An experimental investigation of the relationship between quantifier scope, prosody, and information structure. Linguistic Inquiry 49/4:741–779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00288

Jackendoff, Ray 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Jing, Chun-Yuan 2008. Pragmatic Computation in Language Acquisition: Evidence from Disjunction and Conjunction in Negative Context. Disszertáció. College Park: University of Maryland.

Jing, Chun-Yuan – Stephen Crain – Ching-Fen Hsu 2005. The interpretation of focus in Chinese: Child vs. adult language. In Yukio Otsu (szerk.) Proceedings of the 6th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Publishing Company. 165–190.

Larralde, Cécile – Alina Konradt – Kriszta Eszter Szendrői 2021. Information structure and scope interactions: Disjunction wide scope induced by focus. Frontiers in Communication 5:595799. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.595799

Larson, Richard K. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3/2:217–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133841

Lenth, Russell V. 2016. Least-Squares Means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69/1:1–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01

Liu, Chin-Ting Jimbo – Li-mei Chen 2017. Processing conjunctive entailment of disjunction. Language and Linguistics 18/2:269–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.2.05liu

Luchkina, Tatiana – Tania Ionin 2015. The effect of prosody on availability of inverse scope in Russian. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 23:418–437.

Lungu, Oana – Anamaria Fălăuș – Francesca Panzeri 2021. Disjunction in negative contexts: A cross-linguistic experimental study. Journal of Semantics 38/2:221–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffab002

Nicolae, Andreea Cristina 2017. Deriving the positive polarity behavior of plain disjunction. Semantics and Pragmatics 10/5:1–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.5

Pagliarini, Elena – Stephen Crain – Maria Teresa Guasti 2018. The compositionality of logical connectives in child Italian. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47/6:1243–1277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9596-1

Pagliarini, Elena – Oana Lungu – Angeliek van Hout – Lilla Pintér – Balázs Surányi – Stephen Crain – Maria Teresa Guasti 2022. How adults and children interpret disjunction under negation in Dutch, French, Hungarian and Italian: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language Learning and Development 18/1:97–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2021.1941966

Pruitt, Kathryn – Floris Roelofsen 2013. The interpretation of prosody in disjunctive questions. Linguistic Inquiry 44/4:632–650. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00141

R Core Team 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.

Rooth, Mats – Barbara H. Partee 1982. Conjunction, type ambiguity and wide scope „or”. Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.

Spector, Benjamin 2014. Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity. Semantics and Pragmatics 7/11:1–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.11

Syrett, Kristen – Georgia Simon – Kirsten Nisula 2014. Prosodic disambiguation of scopally ambiguous quantificational sentences in a discourse context. Journal of Linguistics 50/2:453–493. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226714000012

Szabolcsi, Anna 2002. Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity. In István Kenesei – Péter Siptár (szerk.) Approaches to Hungarian 8. Papers from the Budapest Conference. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 217–239.

Uegaki, Wataru 2018. A unified semantics for the Japanese Q-particle ka in indefinites, questions and disjunctions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3/1:14. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.238

Verbuk, Anna 2006. The acquisition of the Russian or. In Erin Bainbridge – Brian Agbayani (szerk.) Proceedings of the thirty-fourth Western Conference on Linguistics. Fresno: Department of Linguistics, California State University. 443–455.

Most read articles by the same author(s)