Miért nem a feltett kérdésre válaszolnak a betegek? Gyógytornász-beteg konzultációk elemzése 2
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Absztrakt
A tanulmány gyógytornászok és betegeik közötti első találkozások dialógusainak kezdeti szakaszát vizsgálja. Az elemzés fókuszában a betegeknek a gyógytornászok nyitókérdéseire (NYK) érkező válaszai állnak. Mivel a NYK-ek célja a vizit okainak, azaz a beteg aktuálisan tapasztalt problémáinak a feltárása, a válaszok induktív csoportosítása azok információtartalmán alapult. A korpuszban hét válaszkategóriát azonosítottam: (1) Informatív (40%), (2) Történet (26,7%), (3) Hiányos (22,7%), (4) Képalkotó eredmény, orvosi diagnózis (21,3%), (5) Pragmatikailag nem megfelelő (12%), (6) Tisztázó (2,7%), és (7) Egyéb (5,3%) típusú válaszok. A NYK-ek nyelvi jellemzői és a rájuk érkező választípusok összefüggéseinek statisztikai elemzése nem ad magyarázatot az utóbbiak sokszínűségére. A tanulmány a szociokognitív megközelítés keretein belül ad magyarázatot az eredményekre.
Letöltések
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Hivatkozások
Allan, Keith 2013. What is common ground? In Alessandro Capone – Franco Lo Piparo – Marco Carapezza (szerk.) Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 2) Cham: Springer. 285–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_11
Bara, Bruno G. 2017. Cognitive pragmatics. In Yan Huang (szerk.) The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. 279–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.14
Beckman, Howard B. – Richard M. Frankel 1984. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine 101/5:692–696. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-692
Boncz Imre (szerk.) 2015. Kutatásmódszertani alapismeretek. Pécs: Pécsi Tudományegyetem Egészségtudományi Kar.
Brinjikji, W. – P.H. Luetmer – B. Comstock – B.W. Bresnahan – L.E. Chen et al. 2015. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. American Journal of Neuroradiology 36/4:811–816. doi: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4173
Charon, Rita – Michele G. Greene – Ronald D. Adelman 1994. Multi-dimensional interaction analysis: A collaborative approach to the study of medical discourse. Social Science & Medicine 39/7:955–965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90207-0
Chester, Emily C. – Natalie C. Robinson – Lisa C. Roberts 2014. Opening clinical encounters in an adult musculoskeletal setting. Manual Therapy 19/4:306–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.03.011
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539
Clark, Herbert H. – Edward F. Schaefer 1989. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13/2:259–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7
Dijck, José van 2005. The Transparent Body. A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging. (In Vivo) Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Engel, George L. 1977. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 196/4286:129–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460
Geurts, Bart 2017. Presupposition and givenness. In Yan Huang (szerk.) The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 180–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.21
Gobat, Nina – Paul Kinnersley – John W. Gregory – Michael Robling 2015. What is agenda setting in the clinical encounter? Consensus from literature review and expert consultation. Patient Education and Counseling 98/7:822–829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.024
Grice, H. Paul 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole – Jerry L. Morgan (szerk.) Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58.
Gyuris, Beáta 2017. New perspectives on bias in polar questions: A study of Hungarian -e. International Review of Pragmatics 9/1:1–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00000003
Hakulinen, Auli 2009. Conversation types. In Sigurd D’hondt – Jan-Ola Östman – Jef Verschueren (szerk.) The Pragmatics of Interaction. (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 4) John Benjamins Publishing Company. 55–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.4.03hak
Hayano, Kaoru 2012. Question design in conversation. In Jack Sidnell – Tanya Stivers (szerk.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 395–414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch19
Heritage, John 2010. Questioning in medicine. In Alice F. Freed – Susan Ehrlich (szerk.) „Why Do You Ask?” The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford University Press. 42–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0003
Heritage, John – Douglas W. Maynard 2006. Introduction: Analyzing interaction between doctors and patients in primary care encounters. In John Heritage – Douglas W. Maynard (szerk.) Communication in Medical Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.003
Heritage, John – Jeffrey D. Robinson 2006a. Accounting for the visit: giving reasons for seeking medical care. In John Heritage – Douglas W. Maynard (szerk.) Communication in Medical Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 48–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.005
Heritage, John – Jeffrey D. Robinson 2006b. The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication 19/2:89–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1902_1
Hood-Medland, Eve Angeline – Anne E. C. White – Richard L. Kravitz – Stephen G. Henry 2021. Agenda setting and visit openings in primary care visits involving patients taking opioids for chronic pain. BMC Family Practice 22:4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01317-4
Hydén, Lars–Christer – Elliot G. Mishler 1999. Language and Medicine. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19:174–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190093
Jones, Rodney H. 2013. Health and Risk Communication. An Applied Linguistic Perspective. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Kecskes, Istvan 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40/3:385–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004
Kecskes, Istvan 2010. The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1/1:50–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
Kecskes, Istvan 2012. Encyclopaedic knowledge and cultural models. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (szerk.) Cognitive Pragmatics. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 4) Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. 175–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.175
Kecskes, István 2014. Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kecskes, Istvan 2017. Cross- Cultural and Intercultural Pragmatics. In Yan Huang (szerk.) The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. 400–415.
Kecskes, Istvan – Fenghui Zhang 2009. Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics & Cognition 17/2:331–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec
Kiefer, Ferenc 1980. Yes-no questions as Wh-questions. In John R. Searle – Ferenc Kiefer – Manfred Bierwisch (szerk.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. (Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 10) Dordrecht: Springer. 97–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_5
Mishler, Elliot George 1984. The Discourse of Medicine. Dialectics of Medical Interviews. (Language and Learning for Human Service Professions) Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Németh T., Enikő 2019. Implicit Subject and Direct Object Arguments in Hungarian Language Use. Grammar and Pragmatics Interacting. (Pragmatic Interfaces) Equinox.
Roberts, Lisa C. – Faye A. Burrow 2018. Interruption and rapport disruption: measuring the prevalence and nature of verbal interruptions during back pain consultations. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 11/2:95–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2018.1449289
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. Soliciting patients’ presenting concerns. In John Heritage – Douglas W. Maynard (szerk.) Communication in Medical Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 22–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.004
Robinson, Jeffrey D. – John Heritage 2005. The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: the completion relevance of current symptoms. Social Science & Medicine 61/2:481–493. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.004
Robinson, Jeffrey D. – Alexandra Tate – John Heritage 2016. Agenda-setting revisited: When and how do primary-care physicians solicit patients’ additional concerns? Patient Education and Counseling 99/5:718–723. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.009
Rudy, Iris Sun – Alexandra Poulos – Laura Owen – Ashlee Batters – Kasia Kieliszek – Jessica Willox – Hazel Jenkins 2015. The correlation of radiographic findings and patient symptomatology in cervical degenerative joint disease: a cross-sectional study. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 23:9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-015-0052-0
Sacks, Harvey – Emanuel A. Schegloff – Gail Jefferson 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50/4:696–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Schegloff, Emanuel A. – Harvey Sacks 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8/4:289–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
Sidnell, Jack 2010. Conversation Analysis. An introduction. (Language in Society 37) Chichester, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Silverman, Jonathan – Suzanne M. Kurtz – Juliet Draper 2013. Skills for communicating with patients. 3. kiadás. London: Radcliffe Publishing.
Smith, Robert C. – Auguste H. Fortin – Francesca Dwamena – Richard M. Frankel 2013. An evidence-based patient-centered method makes the biopsychosocial model scientific. Patient Education and Counseling 91/3:265–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.010
Stalnaker, Robert 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25/5–6:701–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902
Stortenbeker, Inge – Wyke Stommel – Sandra Dulmen – Peter Lucassen – Enny Das – Tim Hartman 2020. Linguistic and interactional aspects that characterize consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 132:109994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109994
Teas Gill, Virginia – Felicia Roberts 2012. Conversation analysis in medicine. In Jack Sidnell – Tanya Stivers (szerk.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 575–592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch28
Tsai, Mei-hui 2006. Opening hearts and minds: a linguistic framework for analyzing open questions in doctor-patient communication = 使君傾言 : 醫病溝通中開放式問句之語言學分析. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Tsai, Mei-hui – Feng-hwa Lu – Richard M. Frankel 2014. Teaching medical students to become discourse analysts. From conversational transcripts to clinical applications. In Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton – Wen-ying Sylvia Chou (szerk.) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Health Communication. London: Routledge. 327–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315856971.ch20
Verschueren, Jef 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold Publishers.